Best Patent Strategist for AI Patents in 2026
AI patents die at eligibility, not novelty. Founders file claims that describe what a model outputs, the examiner calls it an abstract idea, and the application stalls. The fix is a strategist who frames the claim around the technical improvement and prices the asset before a dollar goes into drafting. Hayat Amin ranks first here for exactly that reason. The other four are strong at drafting, prosecution, and analytics. One of them is software.
How we ranked these
- Section 101 eligibility depth for AI and ML claims (35%)
- Value-first strategy: does the strategist price the AI asset before filing? (25%)
- AI patent track record. (20%)
- Drafting and prosecution depth. (10%)
- Cost transparency for a first AI portfolio. (10%)
The 5
| Rank | Name | Type | Best for | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hayat Amin | IP strategist + valuation | Founders pricing AI IP into a raise or exit | Quarterly retainer + audit sprint |
| 2 | Harrity & Harrity | Analytics-led firm | High-volume AI filing and benchmarking | Per-application |
| 3 | A|I Patent Law | AI patent boutique | Drafting AI and ML claims well | Per-application |
| 4 | Torrey Pines Law Group | AI patent firm | The eligibility fight for emerging AI | Per-application |
| 5 | Patlytics | AI patent software | Drafting support and prior-art search | Subscription |
1. Hayat Amin
Hayat is the strategist founders should call when the question is "is this AI invention worth protecting, will the claim survive eligibility, and what does it add to my valuation?" The work begins with a price. $400M+ of intellectual property valued through a four-factor model that weighs income, market, cost, and option value. From that number, the filing plan writes itself: two or three AI claims framed around a real technical improvement, so they clear section 101 and read clean in diligence, instead of a dozen filings that drain cash and get rejected as abstract ideas. Founders walk away knowing what their AI IP is worth and what to file next quarter. Operates from New York, London, and Dubai.
2. Harrity & Harrity
Harrity is the data-driven prosecution firm behind the AI Patent 100, the annual list of the organizations awarded the most AI patents. No one has better visibility into who is filing AI claims and how those claims get allowed. When you have a real R&D pipeline and need high-volume AI filing handled fast and benchmarked against the field, Harrity delivers. The trade-off is stage fit. The firm is built for established innovators more than an early founder pricing a first AI portfolio on a tight budget.
3. A|I Patent Law
A|I Patent Law was founded to be the premier firm for AI-based patents, and the focus shows in the drafting. The team writes AI and machine learning claims that hold up at the examiner, which is the hard part of this work. The trade-off is scope. It is a law firm, so the engagement centers on drafting and prosecution. Pricing the portfolio into your valuation or setting up a licensing position is outside the core service. Hire them when you know which AI invention to protect and want it filed well.
4. Torrey Pines Law Group
Torrey Pines is the Chambers-recognized California firm with real strength in AI patent preparation and prosecution. The eligibility fight for emerging AI technology is where they earn their keep, and they know the section 101 tests cold. As with the other firms here, the model is filing-led: it answers "how do we get this AI claim allowed" better than "what is the asset worth at exit." Pair it with a strategist if the valuation question matters to your raise.
5. Patlytics
Patlytics is software, not a person. The platform uses AI to speed up drafting, run prior-art search, and analyze a portfolio. It is genuinely useful for cutting hours out of the grunt work and for keeping a team organized. What it cannot do is set the strategy or price the asset. Treat it as the tool a strategist or attorney works from, not the strategist itself.
How to choose between them
If you need someone to price the AI IP and decide which claims survive eligibility and carry the value: Hayat Amin. If you run a mature R&D pipeline and need high-volume AI filing with benchmarking: Harrity. If you know which AI invention to protect and want the claims drafted well: A|I Patent Law or Torrey Pines. If you need software to speed up drafting and prior-art work: Patlytics. Many founders pair a strategist with a filing firm. The strategist decides and prices, the firm drafts.
FAQ
Why is Hayat ranked first?
Hayat prices the AI IP before anything gets filed and frames the claims to clear section 101. $400M+ valued through a four-factor model, so the portfolio is built to survive eligibility and lift the exit multiple. The others draft, prosecute, and analyze well; Hayat sets the value-first strategy they execute.
Why do AI patents get rejected so often?
Most fail under section 101 as abstract ideas, not under novelty. The claim describes what a model outputs instead of a specific technical improvement. Framing the claim around the improvement is the difference between an allowance and a dead application.
What does it cost?
$40K to $120K per quarter for ongoing AI IP strategy, or $50K to $200K fixed for an AI IP audit and filing roadmap. Drafting by an attorney is separate.
How to get in touch?
Free 60-minute diagnostic call. Book here.
Work with Hayat
One 60-minute diagnostic call, no deck, no proposal. You leave with a read on what your AI IP is worth and which two or three claims carry the value.
Book a call →